<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Access Anthropology &#187; Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/category/integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org</link>
	<description>Promoting Open Access in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 07:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Editorial on Commerical and Not-for-Profit Scholarly Publishing</title>
		<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/10/16/editorial-on-commerical-and-not-for-profit-scholarly-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/10/16/editorial-on-commerical-and-not-for-profit-scholarly-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholarly Societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University Presses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers of the Open Access Anthropology blog might have an interest in an opinion essay that I (Jason Baird Jackson) wrote recently. In it, I lay out some modest steps  that scholars interested in changing the direction of scholarly communications might take. The focus is a plea to withdraw from working with commercial publishers. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers of the Open Access Anthropology blog might have an interest in an opinion essay that I (Jason Baird Jackson) wrote recently. In it, I lay out some modest steps  that scholars interested in changing the direction of scholarly communications might take. The focus is a plea to withdraw from working with commercial publishers. The essay can be found on my website here: <a href="http://wp.me/p6MUY-5r" target="_blank">http://wp.me/p6MUY-5r</a> . Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/10/16/editorial-on-commerical-and-not-for-profit-scholarly-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Publisher Sage Captures and Encloses Sociology, Spoils the &#8220;Good News&#8221; by Making Political Science Angry</title>
		<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/08/corporate-publisher-sage-captures-and-encloses-sociology-spoils-the-good-news-by-making-political-science-angry/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/08/corporate-publisher-sage-captures-and-encloses-sociology-spoils-the-good-news-by-making-political-science-angry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholarly Societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inside Higher Education reports today on two developments in social science publishing centered on the large commercial publisher Sage.  In the story available here, we learn that the American Sociological Association, has followed the lead of the AAA and foresaken self-publishing its journals portfolio in lieu of a co-publishing agreement with Sage. This would have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Inside Higher Education</em> reports today on two developments in social science publishing centered on the large commercial publisher Sage.  In the story available <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/07/07/sage" target="_blank">here</a>, we learn that the American Sociological Association, has followed the lead of the AAA and foresaken self-publishing its journals portfolio in lieu of a co-publishing agreement with Sage. This would have been a straight forward story of celebration or mourning (depending on where you stand), were it not co-occuring with the other storyline presented in the IHE story.  A fully Saged owned political science journal&#8211;<em>Political Theory</em>&#8211;is at the center of a controversy related to a flubbed firing/hiring/replacing of the journal&#8217;s editor.  The episode revealed for many political scientists the conflicts built into corporate owned or controlled journals and showed again the misallignment of commercial and scholarly values.  <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/07/07/sage" target="_blank">Read all about it</a> and think twice when Sage calls and asks you to take up an editorship.  Thanks IHE.</p>
<p>(Forget open access.  Why again are we are dismantling the university press system and selling/giving away the pieces to these folks?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/08/corporate-publisher-sage-captures-and-encloses-sociology-spoils-the-good-news-by-making-political-science-angry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Reason Not to Trust Corporate Publishers (and to Doubt the Societies Who Work with Them)</title>
		<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/04/another-reason-not-to-trust-corporate-publishers-and-to-doubt-the-societies-who-work-with-them/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/04/another-reason-not-to-trust-corporate-publishers-and-to-doubt-the-societies-who-work-with-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inside Higher Education recently reported on a scheme through which Elsevier sought to offer $25 Amazon gift cards to anyone who gave one of its textbooks a five star rating on the Amazon or Barnes and Noble websites.  The sorry details are available in the IHE story here. Please join me in having nothing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Inside Higher Education</em> recently reported on a scheme through which Elsevier sought to offer $25 Amazon gift cards to anyone who gave one of its textbooks a five star rating on the Amazon or Barnes and Noble websites.  The sorry details are available in the IHE story <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/23/elsevier" target="_blank">here</a>. Please join me in having nothing to do with Elsevier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/04/another-reason-not-to-trust-corporate-publishers-and-to-doubt-the-societies-who-work-with-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does your publisher also issue fake journals?</title>
		<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/06/07/does-your-publisher-also-issue-fake-journals/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/06/07/does-your-publisher-also-issue-fake-journals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scholarly communication reformers and critics recently learned of another way in which the for-profit, toll access journal system has become significantly corrupted when media reports revealed that the giant publishing firm Elsevier has been publishing fake medical journals at the behest of large pharmaceutical firms including Merck. While those concerned with the corporate enclosure of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholarly communication reformers and critics recently learned of another way in which the for-profit, toll access journal system has become significantly corrupted when media reports revealed that the giant publishing firm Elsevier has been publishing fake medical journals at the behest of large pharmaceutical firms including Merck. While those concerned with the corporate enclosure of journal publishing in anthropology and neighboring fields usually focus attention on Wiley-Blackwell, Routledge and other firms with large and growing footprints in these fields, it is worth noting in connection with the fake journal episode that a number of anthropology titles are on Elsevier&#8217;s +/-2000 journal list. There may be more titles from anthropology and neighboring areas, but I identify the following:</p>
<p><em>l&#8217;Anthropologie<br />
Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia<br />
Evolution and Human Behavior<br />
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology<br />
Journal of Archaeological Science<br />
Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts</em></p>
<p>I am sure that these journals are edited by excellent colleagues and are contributed to by first-rate scholars, but I would not want to be associated with a journal published by Elsevier. The reasons are multiple but they now include a documented (and <a href="http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_01233" target="_blank">acknowledged</a>) history of misleading publishing activity in the service of big drug companies and not in the service of scholarly integrity.</p>
<p>For the background on the fake journal story, see <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/06/elsevier-fake-journal-tally-now-9.html" target="_blank">here</a> and search on &#8220;Elsevier&#8221; at <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html" target="_blank">Open Access News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/06/07/does-your-publisher-also-issue-fake-journals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
