<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Access Anthropology &#187; Elsevier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/category/elsevier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org</link>
	<description>Promoting Open Access in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another Reason Not to Trust Corporate Publishers (and to Doubt the Societies Who Work with Them)</title>
		<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/04/another-reason-not-to-trust-corporate-publishers-and-to-doubt-the-societies-who-work-with-them/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/04/another-reason-not-to-trust-corporate-publishers-and-to-doubt-the-societies-who-work-with-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inside Higher Education recently reported on a scheme through which Elsevier sought to offer $25 Amazon gift cards to anyone who gave one of its textbooks a five star rating on the Amazon or Barnes and Noble websites.  The sorry details are available in the IHE story here. Please join me in having nothing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Inside Higher Education</em> recently reported on a scheme through which Elsevier sought to offer $25 Amazon gift cards to anyone who gave one of its textbooks a five star rating on the Amazon or Barnes and Noble websites.  The sorry details are available in the IHE story <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/23/elsevier" target="_blank">here</a>. Please join me in having nothing to do with Elsevier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/07/04/another-reason-not-to-trust-corporate-publishers-and-to-doubt-the-societies-who-work-with-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does your publisher also issue fake journals?</title>
		<link>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/06/07/does-your-publisher-also-issue-fake-journals/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/06/07/does-your-publisher-also-issue-fake-journals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scholarly communication reformers and critics recently learned of another way in which the for-profit, toll access journal system has become significantly corrupted when media reports revealed that the giant publishing firm Elsevier has been publishing fake medical journals at the behest of large pharmaceutical firms including Merck. While those concerned with the corporate enclosure of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholarly communication reformers and critics recently learned of another way in which the for-profit, toll access journal system has become significantly corrupted when media reports revealed that the giant publishing firm Elsevier has been publishing fake medical journals at the behest of large pharmaceutical firms including Merck. While those concerned with the corporate enclosure of journal publishing in anthropology and neighboring fields usually focus attention on Wiley-Blackwell, Routledge and other firms with large and growing footprints in these fields, it is worth noting in connection with the fake journal episode that a number of anthropology titles are on Elsevier&#8217;s +/-2000 journal list. There may be more titles from anthropology and neighboring areas, but I identify the following:</p>
<p><em>l&#8217;Anthropologie<br />
Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia<br />
Evolution and Human Behavior<br />
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology<br />
Journal of Archaeological Science<br />
Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts</em></p>
<p>I am sure that these journals are edited by excellent colleagues and are contributed to by first-rate scholars, but I would not want to be associated with a journal published by Elsevier. The reasons are multiple but they now include a documented (and <a href="http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_01233" target="_blank">acknowledged</a>) history of misleading publishing activity in the service of big drug companies and not in the service of scholarly integrity.</p>
<p>For the background on the fake journal story, see <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/06/elsevier-fake-journal-tally-now-9.html" target="_blank">here</a> and search on &#8220;Elsevier&#8221; at <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html" target="_blank">Open Access News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.openaccessanthropology.org/2009/06/07/does-your-publisher-also-issue-fake-journals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

